The Economies of Attention
Literature, Distraction, and the Digital Self
Book Overview
The Economies of Attention: Literature, Distraction, and the Digital Self begins from a deceptively simple observation: in an age of digital abundance, the scarcest resource is no longer information but attention itself. Drawing on Herbert Simon’s foundational insight that “a wealth of information creates a poverty of attention,” this volume asks what becomes of literature — and of the reading self — when human focus is fragmented, accelerated, and commodified by the platforms that now mediate so much of our cultural life.
The book opens by mapping the terrain of the attention economy, tracing its lineage from Simon through Georg Franck and Yves Citton and defining the forces — fragmentation, acceleration, and the surveillance and commodification of focus — that condition contemporary reading. It examines the emergence of the “digital self”: an identity continuously curated and performed for metrics of validation, in which Goffman’s dramaturgy of self-presentation is transformed by algorithmic infrastructure, and self-worth becomes tethered to likes, views, and shares.
From there the volume turns to literature itself. It recovers distraction as a recurring literary motif that long predates the smartphone — from Emma Bovary’s restless reading in nineteenth-century provincial France to the sensory overload of the Dickensian city — before confronting the platform era directly: the algorithmic gaze, the metrics of attention, and the “digital cage” in which deep reading must now struggle for a foothold. Its closing movement is constructive, arguing that literature offers not merely a critique of distraction but a practical toolkit for attentional agency and flourishing.
The central argument is at once a defense and a provocation: literature is not a casualty of the attention economy but one of our most enduring resources against it — a sanctuary for sustained thought and a battleground on which the struggle for attentional sovereignty, and for an authentic digital self, is waged.
About the Author
Dr. Basharat Ali
Dr. Basharat Ali is an Assistant Professor (OPS) in the Department of Sociology, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, at Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan. He holds a Ph.D. in Sociology and brings to his scholarship a sustained commitment to academic excellence in teaching, research, and intellectual inquiry.
His research interests span Digital Sociology, Media and Cultural Studies, Attention Studies, the Sociology of Literature, and Digital Identity, with a particular emphasis on the attention economy, deep reading, and the formation of the self in digital culture. Dr. Ali has contributed to scholarly discourse through research presented at national and international forums and through publications in peer-reviewed outlets.
Working at the intersection of sociology, media studies, and literary inquiry, he examines how digital environments reshape cognition, social interaction, and cultural production. He completed his Ph.D. at Government College University, Faisalabad (2016–2019), following an M.Phil./MS at the University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (2012–2014). His work reflects an enduring belief in the public value of the social sciences and the humanities in an increasingly mediated world.
Endorsements & Reviews
“A timely and erudite intervention. Dr. Ali moves beyond the familiar lament about shrinking attention spans to show how literature itself has always thought about distraction — and why that long history matters now more than ever. Lucid, interdisciplinary, and quietly urgent.”
“Rare is the study that speaks fluently to media studies, sociology, and literary criticism at once. By reading the attention economy through the lens of the novel — and the novel through the lens of the attention economy — this volume reframes a debate too often reduced to moral panic. Essential for scholars of digital culture.”
“The closing chapters on attentional agency are the most hopeful and practical I have read on this subject. Rather than mourning the decline of deep reading, Dr. Ali shows how it can be reclaimed. A vital book for students, educators, and anyone who has felt their focus fracture in the glow of a screen.”
Free & Open Access
This scholarly work is available to everyone. Click the cover to start reading our new publication without barriers.
The Economies of Attention: Literature, Distraction, and the Digital Self
References
Showing 10 of 83 referencesShowing all 83 references
1
O. Taña, M. A., & C. Tantiado, R. (2024). Pupils’ Reading Distraction and Confidence. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS, 07(06). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i06-45 (Original work published as Pupils’ Reading Distraction and Confidence)
2
Attia, N., Baig, L., Marzouk, Y., & Khan, A. (2017). The potential effect of technology and distractions on undergraduate students’ concentration. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.334.12560
3
Clinton‐Lisell, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269
4
Frisby, B., Sexton, B., Buckner, M., Beck, A., & Kaufmann, R. (2018). Peers and instructors as sources of distraction from a cognitive load perspective. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2018.120206
5
Furenes, M., Kucirkova, N., & Bus, A. (2021). A comparison of children’s reading on paper versus screen: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 91(4), 483-517. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321998074
6
Lin, L., Lee, J., & Robertson, T. (2011). Reading while watching video: the effect of video content on reading comprehension and media multitasking ability. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(2), 183-201. https://doi.org/10.2190/ec.45.2.d
7
Liu, Z. (2021). Reading in the age of digital distraction. Journal of Documentation, 78(6), 1201-1212. https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-07-2021-0130
8
Robison, M. and Unsworth, N. (2015). Working memory capacity offers resistance to mind‐wandering and external distraction in a context‐specific manner. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(5), 680-690. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3150
9
Ronconi, A., Masón, L., Manzione, L., & Schüler, A. (2024). Effects of digital reading with on‐screen distractions: an eye‐tracking study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13106
10
Unsworth, N. and McMillan, B. (2013). Mind wandering and reading comprehension: examining the roles of working memory capacity, interest, motivation, and topic experience.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 39(3), 832-842. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029669
11
Wang, C., Salisbury‐Glennon, J., Dai, Y., Lee, S., & Dong, J. (2022). Empowering college students to decrease digital distraction through the use of self-regulated learning strategies. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(4), ep388. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12456
12
Brekke, J. and Fischer, A. (2021). Digital scarcity. Internet Policy Review, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.2.1548
13
Huijsmans, I., Ma, I., Micheli, L., Civai, C., Stallen, M., & Sanfey, A. (2019). A scarcity mindset alters neural processing underlying consumer decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(24), 11699-11704. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818572116
14
Shah, A., Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2012). Some consequences of having too little. Science, 338(6107), 682-685. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1222426
15
Small, G., Lee, J., Kaufman, A., Jalil, J., Siddarth, P., Gaddipati, H., … & Bookheimer, S. (2020). Brain health consequences of digital technology use. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 22(2), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.31887/dcns.2020.22.2/gsmall
16
Tomm, B., Shafir, E., & Zhao, J. (2023). Scarcity captures attention and induces neglect: eyetracking and behavoral evidence.. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/c9jq6
17
Zhao, J. and Tomm, B. (2017). Attentional trade-offs under resource scarcity., 78-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58625-0_6
18
Zhao, J. and Tomm, B. (2018). Psychological responses to scarcity.. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.41
19
Cronin, A. (2011). Researching urban space, reflecting on advertising. Space and Culture, 14(4), 356-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331211412278
20
Mays, S., Brickley, M., & Ives, R. (2008). Growth in an english population from the industrial revolution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 136(1), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20780
21
Nicol, H. (2013). Late 19th century urban policy and industrial capitalism in central canada’s cities. Southern Journal of Canadian Studies, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.22215/sjcs.v1i1.304
22
Coates, J. (2017). Key figure of mobility: the flâneur. Social Anthropology, 25(1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12381
23
Gluck, M. (2003). The flâneur and the aesthetic. Theory Culture & Society, 20(5), 53-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764030205003
24
Kancı, T. and TARCAN, U. (2022). Flâneur, phantasmagoria and existence in modern cities: an analysis of benjamin and sartre. Ibad Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (13), 525-537. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.1197631
25
McLaughlin, K. (2005). Paperwork.. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812202779
26
Murail, E. (2017). A body passes by: the flâneur and the senses in nineteenth-century london and paris. The Senses and Society, 12(2), 162-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2017.1310454
27
Čermáková, A. and Mahlberg, M. (2022). Gendered body language in children’s literature over time. Language and Literature International Journal of Stylistics, 31(1), 11-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/09639470211072154
28
Amiradakis, M. (2023). A benjaminian appraisal of mass culture and its technologies of reproduction. Acta Academica, 55(2), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.38140/aa.v55i2.7723
29
Latham, A. (1999). The power of distraction: distraction, tactility, and habit in the work of walter benjamin. Environment and Planning D Society and Space, 17(4), 451-473. https://doi.org/10.1068/d170451
30
Leach, N. (2016). The culture of the copy. Architectural Design, 86(5), 126-133. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2098
31
Pa, H. (2022). Critical thinking of frankfurt school of thought in cultural industry. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.23977/aetp.2022.061105
32
Rutsky, R. (2002). Pop-up theory: distraction and consumption in the age of meta-information. Journal of Visual Culture, 1(3), 279-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/147041290200100302
33
Choi, Y. and Kim, J. (2021). Learning analytics for diagnosing cognitive load in e-learning using bayesian network analysis. Sustainability, 13(18), 10149. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810149
34
Derakshan, N. and Eysenck, M. (2009). Anxiety, processing efficiency, and cognitive performance. European Psychologist, 14(2), 168-176. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.14.2.168
35
Eronen, M. and Bringmann, L. (2021). The theory crisis in psychology: how to move forward. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 779-788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970586
36
Jong, T. (2009). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38(2), 105-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0
37
Kahneman, D. and Treisman, D. (2020). Anne marie treisman. 27 february 1935—9 february 2018. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 68, 407-430. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbm.2019.0035
38
Schnotz, W. and Kürschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 469-508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9053-4
39
Allen, G. (2023). In a hurry: how time constraints and the presentation of web search results affect user behaviour and experience., 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34444-2_16
40
Baumbach, S. (2021). The economy of attention and the novel.. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2stpg
41
Clarke, M., McEwan, K., Ness, J., Waters, K., Basran, J., & Gilbert, P. (2016). A descriptive study of feelings of arrested escape (entrapment) and arrested anger in people presenting to an emergency department following an episode of self-harm. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00155
42
Fuller‐Thomson, E., Carroll, S., & Yang, W. (2017). Suicide attempts among individuals with specific learning disorders: an underrecognized issue. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(3), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417714776
43
Goode, A. (2024). Beyond the authenticity bind – finstagram as an escape from the attention economy., 161-186. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003559412-7
44
Lotherington, H. and Jenson, J. (2011). Teaching multimodal and digital literacy in l2 settings: new literacies, new basics, new pedagogies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 226-246. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190511000110
45
Padhy, S., Sahoo, M., & Biswas, H. (2015). Psychological co-morbidity in children with specific learning disorders. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.152243
46
Torous, J., Michalak, E., & O’Brien, H. (2020). Digital health and engagement—looking behind the measures and methods. Jama Network Open, 3(7), e2010918. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10918
47
Balaman, F. and Ataman, Ü. (2022). Teacher opinions on the usability of digital stories in pre- school values education. Disiplinlerarası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(13), 353-362. https://doi.org/10.57135/jier.1160170
48
Belda-Medina, J. and Goddard, M. (2024). The effect of digital storytelling on english vocabulary learning in inclusive and diverse education. International Journal of English Language Studies, 6(1), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels.2024.6.1.11
49
Catalano, C. (2022). Using digital storytelling in early childhood education to promote child centredness.. https://doi.org/10.15405/epes.22032.16
50
Greene, S., Burke, K., & McKenna, M. (2018). A review of research connecting digital storytelling, photovoice, and civic engagement. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 844-878. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318794134
51
Kabaran, G. and Duman, B. (2021). The effect of digital storytelling method on learning and study strategies. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(4), 681-694. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.83
52
Liu, C., Wang, P., & Tai, S. (2016). An analysis of student engagement patterns in language learning facilitated by web 2.0 technologies. Recall, 28(2), 104-122. https://doi.org/10.1017/s095834401600001x
53
Mangione, G., Pierri, A., & Capuano, N. (2014). Emotion-based digital storytelling for risk education: empirical evidences from the alice project. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 24(2), 184. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijceell.2014.060161
54
Rodríguez, C., Jiménez, M., Guijarro, B., & González, C. (2021). Digital storytelling in education: a systematic review of the literature. Review of European Studies, 13(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v13n2p13
55
Dedema, M. and Rosenbaum, H. (2024). Socio‐technical issues in the platform‐mediated gig economy: a systematic literature review: an annual review of information science and technology (arist) paper. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 75(3), 344-374. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24868
56
Graham, M., Hjorth, I., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2017). Digital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 135-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916687250
57
Groenewald, E. (2024). Circular economy strategies in supply chain management: towards zero waste.. pst, 48(1), 464-480. https://doi.org/10.52783/pst.291
58
Kwok, C. and Chan, N. (2021). Towards a multi-dimensional theory of temporal control in the gig economy. Aoir Selected Papers of Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2021i0.12196
59
Ruiz–Real, J., Uribe-Toril, J., Valenciano, J., & Gázquez‐Abad, J. (2018). Worldwide research on circular economy and environment: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(12), 2699. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122699
60
Baumbach, S. (2021). The economy of attention and the novel.. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2stpg
61
Bernardy, J. (2011). Attention as bounded resource and medium in cultural memory: a phenomenological or economic approach?. Empedocles European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 2(2), 241-254. https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc.2.2.241_1
62
Devik, S., Munkeby, H., Finnanger, M., & Moe, A. (2020). Nurse managers’ perspectives on working with everyday ethics in long-term care. Nursing Ethics, 27(8), 1669-1680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020935958
63
Main, J., DeBruine, L., Little, A., & Jones, B. (2010). Interactions among the effects of head orientation, emotional expression, and physical attractiveness on face preferences. Perception, 39(1), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6503
64
Rant, M. (2018). Levers behind the scene: the importance of the individual and organizational awareness for the organizational success in the midst of digital transformation. Management Studies, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2185/2018.06.005
65
Sakurada, T., Yoshida, M., & Nagai, K. (2022). Individual optimal attentional strategy in motor learning tasks characterized by steady-state somatosensory and visual evoked potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.784292
66
Salera, C. (2024). Preserved learning of implicit regularities with predictive social cues in older adults. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1470649
67
Shteynberg, G., Hirsh, J., Apfelbaum, E., Larsen, J., Galinsky, A., & Roese, N. (2014). Feeling more together: group attention intensifies emotion.. Emotion, 14(6), 1102-1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037697
68
Sweeny, T. and Whitney, D. (2014). Perceiving crowd attention. Psychological Science, 25(10), 1903-1913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614544510
69
Tominaga, H., Uchida, Y., Miyamoto, Y., & Yamasaki, T. (2017). Negative affect during a collective (but not an individual) task is associated with holistic attention in east asian cultural context. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01283
70
Belardinelli, G. and Rendsvig, R. (2021). Epistemic planning with attention as a bounded resource.. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2105.09976
71
Chinakidzwa, M. and Phiri, M. (2020). Impact of digital marketing capabilities on market performance of small to medium enterprise agro-processors in harare, zimbabwe. Verslas Teorija Ir Praktika, 21(2), 746-757. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2020.12149
72
Correa, T. (2013). Bottom-up technology transmission within families: exploring how youths influence their parents’ digital media use with dyadic data. Journal of Communication, 64(1), 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12067
73
Huang, G., Xiao-qian, L., Chen, W., & Straubhaar, J. (2018). Fall-behind parents? the influential factors on digital parenting self-efficacy in disadvantaged communities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(9), 1186-1206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218773820
74
Jain, V., Belk, R., Ambika, A., & Pathak‐Shelat, M. (2020). Narratives selves in the digital world: an empirical investigation. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(2), 368-380. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1869
75
Jones, S. and Walsh, J. (2021). The disruptive effects of pain on the early allocation of attentional resources: an attentional blink study. European Journal of Pain, 25(10), 2202-2211. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1833
76
Matthews, G., Warm, J., & Smith, A. (2017). Task engagement and attentional resources. Human Factors the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 59(1), 44-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816673782
77
Thomson, D., Besner, D., & Smilek, D. (2013). In pursuit of off-task thought: mind wandering-performance trade-offs while reading aloud and color naming. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00360
78
Thomson, D., Besner, D., & Smilek, D. (2015). A resource-control account of sustained attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 82-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614556681
79
Umezawa, K., Ishida, T., Aramoto, M., Kobayashi, M., Nakazawa, M., & Hirasawa, S. (2016). A method based on self-study log information for improving effectiveness of classroom component in flipped classroom approach. International Journal of Software Innovation, 4(2), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsi.2016040102
80
Devik, S., Munkeby, H., Finnanger, M., & Moe, A. (2020). Nurse managers’ perspectives on working with everyday ethics in long-term care. Nursing Ethics, 27(8), 1669-1680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020935958
81
Foldi, N. (2010). Getting the hang of it: preferential gist over verbatim story recall and the roles of attentional capacity and the episodic buffer in alzheimer disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17(01), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617710001165
82
Murphy, D. and Castel, A. (2022). Responsible attention: the effect of divided attention on metacognition and responsible remembering. Psychological Research, 87(4), 1085-1100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01711-w
83
Pandey, S. and Gupta, R. (2022). Irrelevant angry faces impair response inhibition, and the go and stop processes share attentional resources. Scientific Reports, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19116-5