Skip to content
Editorial Policies  ·  Lumina Literati Publishing

Plagiarism & Artificial Intelligence Policy

Our standards for originality, integrity, and the responsible use of AI tools in scholarly manuscripts submitted to Lumina Literati Publishing (LLP).

Applies to: All manuscript submissions Review: Double-blind peer review Enforced by: LLP Editorial Board
01

Policy on Plagiarism

Zero Tolerance

Zero tolerance for plagiarism. Manuscripts found to contain plagiarized content are rejected immediately. Where plagiarism is confirmed, authors may be banned from submitting further manuscripts to LLP.

What Constitutes Plagiarism

Plagiarism is the use of another person’s words, ideas, data, or work without proper acknowledgement. This includes copying text directly, paraphrasing without attribution, and presenting someone else’s study or findings as your own.

How We Detect It

LLP screens every submission with machine-learning algorithms and dedicated plagiarism-detection software. These tools identify the full range of plagiarism, including verbatim copying, inadequate paraphrasing, and the undisclosed recycling of previously published work.

02

The Process of Dealing with Plagiarism

Three Stages
  1. Initial Review

    All submissions pass through plagiarism-detection software to identify possible instances of unoriginal or unattributed content before editorial evaluation begins.

  2. Editors’ Assessment

    A team of editors conducts an extensive review to determine whether copyright infringement or plagiarism has occurred. Authors may be asked to provide clarification or additional supporting materials at this stage.

  3. Final Decision

    Once plagiarized content is confirmed, the article is removed. Authors are notified of the decision and receive a comprehensive report documenting the editors’ findings.

03

Manuscript Creation Using Artificial Intelligence

Disclosure Required

Appropriate Uses

LLP recognizes the increasing role of artificial intelligence in research and writing. AI-assisted manuscripts may be accepted only if they meet all publication requirements — originality, novelty, and scholarly quality.

Mandatory Declaration

Authors must disclose the use of AI tools in manuscript preparation. The declaration must name the specific AI tools used and state how much each tool contributed to the completed manuscript.

04

Score on AI Usage

Quality & Originality

Quality and Originality Standards

Manuscripts with AI input are rated on scientific soundness, clarity, and creativity. The use of AI does not lower the bar: these manuscripts must maintain the same quality and novelty expected of any LLP publication.

Assessment Methods

LLP employs first-rate machine-learning models to evaluate AI-generated content. The goal is to determine the extent of AI involvement in a manuscript while ensuring the work adheres to established ethical standards.

05

Ethical Considerations

Transparency First
  • Openness. Be transparent about the use of AI tools. Authors must ensure AI-assisted content is original and properly acknowledged.
  • Editorial control. Manuscripts containing AI-generated content undergo extensive human review to verify accuracy, logical consistency, and conformity with accepted academic standards. For these manuscripts specifically, editors and reviewers assess whether the content is original and of good quality.
06

Detection of AI-Generated Manipulation

Advanced Screening

Advanced Measures

LLP uses modern machine-learning models to identify the manipulation or fabrication of data by AI programs — detecting patterns that suggest AI involvement in the generation, amendment, or fabrication of case studies and research data.

Human Confirmation

Where AI manipulation is suspected, specialists may be asked to review the case and provide an expert opinion on the validity of the research findings and the integrity of the collected data.

07

Criteria for Scholarly Publishing

High Standards

High Standards for Every Paper

Every submission — with or without AI assistance — must meet LLP’s high publishing standards: it must contribute significant knowledge to its field, be methodologically sound, and observe ethical norms in the conduct of research.

Peer Review Process

Manuscripts are subjected to double-blind peer review so that no prejudice or partiality affects the outcome. Reviewers examine the scientific merit of the work and the ethical dimensions of the study protocols applied.

08

Authorship Responsibilities

Author Duties
  • Adherence. Authors must ensure every submission complies with LLP’s plagiarism and AI policies — including truthful disclosure of AI use and ethical conduct throughout the research process.
  • Corrections. Authors who uncover errors in their manuscripts must correct them as quickly as possible. This includes issues of plagiarism, undisclosed AI use, or data integrity.

Questions about this policy? If you are unsure whether your use of AI tools or source material complies, disclose it in your submission — the editorial team will assess it during review.

Through compliance with these policies, Lumina Literati Publishing guarantees the publication of authentic, quality research while accommodating the innovative application of AI in scholarship. The credibility and transparency we maintain remain the basis of our academic community’s trust — and set the bar for publishing excellence.

Lumina Literati Publishing  ·  Editorial Board
Scroll to Top